OpenAI GPT-4o Mini vs. Claude 3.5 Sonnet — Interactive Cost & Performance Calculator
Compare OpenAI GPT-4o Mini vs Claude 3.5 Sonnet side-by-side. Use our interactive calculator to estimate exact monthly costs, savings, and performance trade-offs at your scale.
OpenAI GPT-4o Mini
Best for: High-volume classification, extraction & chat
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Best for: Code generation, agentic workflows & nuanced writing
Side-by-Side Technical & Commercial Breakdown: OpenAI GPT-4o Mini vs. Claude 3.5 Sonnet
| Dimension | OpenAI GPT-4o Mini | Claude 3.5 Sonnet |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Anthropic |
| Input Price (per 1M tokens) | $0.150 | $3.000 |
| Output Price (per 1M tokens) | $0.60 | $15.00 |
| Context Window | 128K tokens | 200K tokens |
| Throughput Speed | 145 tok/s | 78 tok/s |
| License / Weights | Proprietary API | Proprietary API |
| Best Use Case | High-volume classification, extraction & chat | Code generation, agentic workflows & nuanced writing |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is more cost-effective in 2026: OpenAI GPT-4o Mini or Claude 3.5 Sonnet?
It depends on your workload volume. Use the interactive sliders above to model your exact monthly scale. OpenAI GPT-4o Mini (High-volume classification, extraction & chat) and Claude 3.5 Sonnet (Code generation, agentic workflows & nuanced writing) have different unit economics that cross over as volume scales.
When should an engineering team choose OpenAI GPT-4o Mini over Claude 3.5 Sonnet?
Choose OpenAI GPT-4o Mini when your primary priority is: High-volume classification, extraction & chat. Choose Claude 3.5 Sonnet when you prioritize: Code generation, agentic workflows & nuanced writing.